Comparison · Employer of Record
When an Employer of Record is genuinely the right answer
We sell the cheaper alternative, so treat this page with the suspicion it deserves, and then read it anyway. An Employer of Record is the right answer more often than a payroll firm's website usually admits.
Short answer: An EOR sells two things a payroll scheme cannot: speed, because the scheme exists already, and a shift in who is legally the employer. If you need one of those two things, buy it without apology; if you do not, you are paying a premium for a payslip.
What you are paying for
The fee buys two things, and only two
Strip out the marketing and an EOR sells speed, because the scheme exists already, and a shift in who is legally the employer. Everything else on the invoice, the payslips, the RTI filing, the pension and any statutory pay that's due, has to happen on every route and a payroll firm does it for a fraction of the price. So the test is not whether the fee looks high. It is whether you need one of those two things. If you do, buy it without apology. If you do not, you are paying a premium for a payslip.
For scale, at 2026/27 rates: four of the best-known EOR platforms publish starting prices of about £297 to £519 per employee a month, with $599 (about £445 at HMRC’s October 2026 rate) the most common (read 22 October 2026), against £157 a month per scheme for a direct payment scheme run for you. An Employer of Record becomes the legal employer and takes on the employer's duties; we run the payroll while you stay the employer, so the fees pay for different things. On top of either sits the salary and the workplace pension. Employer's secondary National Insurance depends on the route. On an EOR, the EOR pays it as the UK employer and passes it on to you, wherever you're based. Without an EOR, an employer based in the EU, the EEA or Switzerland generally owes it directly through an NI-only scheme, while an employer based elsewhere with no UK presence, on a DPNI, usually doesn't. We will ask HMRC for the scheme that fits your facts, and they may suggest a different one once they have the full facts. Where it's due, it's the employer's cost rather than the employee's. Our full Employer of Record cost comparison sets it all out properly, including the one off charges and the extras that are easy to miss on either side.
A quick illustration
Take a fictional Norwegian maker of marine coatings, wanting one technical sales rep in Plymouth for twelve months to find out whether the UK is worth a proper push. Priced both ways at 2026/27 rates, an EOR comes to about £5,340 in fees across the year, and an NI-only scheme run for them to about £2,400 to £2,650 in the first year, setup included. Those are fees only, and the salary, the pension and employer's National Insurance sit on top of either, so the gap between the two routes is the gap in what they charge to run it. They choose the EOR, and they are right to. If the trial fails they end a contract with notice instead of closing a scheme with HMRC, and they never become a UK employer for a job that may not exist in month thirteen. If it works, they move the rep onto their own scheme in year two, and the arithmetic finally goes the other way.
Before you sign
Two questions worth asking any provider
Who actually employs the person. Some providers employ directly in the UK. Others subcontract to a local partner, which puts a company you have never met on your employee's contract of employment. Ask to see the name that will appear on it, and ask who answers a payroll query.
How you leave. Notice periods, exit fees, and whether you can keep the employee at the end, are all far easier to read before you sign than after you have decided to move. Nearly every EOR arrangement ends eventually, usually because the hire worked, so treat the exit terms as part of the price rather than as an afterthought.
If you are still weighing the three routes rather than the providers, the EOR, DPNI or subsidiary guide asks the four questions that usually settle it, and the route finder will name a route in about a minute.
Common questions
Questions people ask before they decide
Is an Employer of Record more expensive than running your own payroll?
On the fee for running the payroll, almost always. The published platform rates start at about £445 per employee per month, against £157 a month per scheme for a direct payment scheme run by a specialist, at 2026/27 rates. Salary and pension sit on top of either. Employer's National Insurance sits on top of the EOR fee, and on your own scheme too if your company is in the EU, the EEA or Switzerland or has a UK presence. What the fee buys is speed and a transfer of the legal employer role, so the useful question is whether you need those, not whether the number is bigger.
Can I move an employee off an EOR later?
Usually, and it is common enough to be routine. You register your own scheme, agree a transfer date with the EOR, and run the first payroll alongside theirs so nothing lands late. The switching guide sets out the order. Read the notice period in the EOR contract before you sign it rather than when you want to leave.
Does an EOR remove my UK employment obligations entirely?
It moves the legal employer relationship, not your involvement. You still direct the work, set the pay and manage the person, and a badly handled ending is still your commercial problem even when the paperwork sits with someone else. Read what your provider takes on and what it hands back to you, because the two vary a lot between providers.
How much faster is an EOR than setting up our own scheme?
An EOR can normally have someone employed within days, because the scheme is already there. On our own estimate, a direct payment scheme takes roughly four to eight weeks to build with HMRC, which publishes no timescale for it, as we set out in how long UK payroll setup takes. An employee can still be paid while a registration is in progress, with the filing caught up once HMRC issues the references, so a slow start does not have to mean an unpaid employee.